If the court confirms an abandoned mineral owner's identity and interest, what is NOT one of its actions?

The option regarding the court authorizing the sale of the mineral interest is not an action typically taken when confirming an abandoned mineral owner's identity and interest. In situations where a mineral owner's rights are recognized, the court's focus is primarily on restoring the rights and interests to the original owner rather than facilitating the sale of those rights.

When a court confirms an abandoned mineral owner’s identity and interest, it is more likely to take actions that reinforce the ownership, such as entering an order to document title, which legally acknowledges the owner's claims. Furthermore, assigning future proceeds to the mineral owner ensures that any income generated from the mineral interest will go directly to the rightful owner. Directing payment of funds to the mineral owner is also consistent with restoring the rights of the rightful claimant, enabling them to benefit from their property.

Thus, the emphasis is on re-establishing ownership and ensuring that the previous owner can pursue or receive benefits from their interests, rather than permitting a sale of those interests.